桑蒂利教授来信如何支持蒋春暄研究工作
蒋春暄
2007年6月12日邵逸夫官方网站宣布2007年邵逸夫数学奖授给普林斯顿高级研究院Robert Langlands和哈佛大学Richard Taylor。Taylor是怀尔斯的学生。1993年怀尔斯论文有漏洞是Taylor填补这个漏洞。怀尔斯论文和他与Taylor合写论文同时发表在1995年《数学年刊》上。Taylor最大贡献是他和怀尔斯共同证明费马大定理。为了怕引起中国人的抗议，宣布时并没有介绍Taylor证明费马大定理工作。这是杨振宁和丘成桐推荐的。普林斯顿高级研究院前院长菲利普· 格里菲斯说，丘成桐是华人数学家的领袖。美国又要派丘成桐来中国宣传怀尔斯和Taylor费马大定理证明，不承认中国人费马大定理证明。这样中科院、北大、清华和普林斯顿又更紧密联合起来。动员全世界数学界封杀蒋春暄工作。“蒋春暄证明世纪数学难题费马大定理遭封杀”的冤案平反，简直是不可能了，他们力量太强大了。中国院士在起关键作用。中科院院长也站在他们一边。对中国这么大成果不关心，那有什么办法呢？中国和美国费马大定理首论权之争，邵逸夫！把你2005年数学奖送给费马大定理第二次证明者怀尔斯，又把你2007年数学奖送给费马大定理第二次证明者Taylor。邵逸夫！你是流芳百世？还是遗臭万年？中国历史将会决定。
费马大定理证明可与人类登上月球相提并论的数学成果（参考消息1995年1月9日）。费马大定理证明可以和物理学中的原子分裂，生命科学中脱氧核糖核酸的发现相提并论（路透社）。费马大定理证明代表一个国家一个民族最高利益，这不是一个学术问题，需要国家支持，向全世界宣布这一划时代成果，才能得到全世界公认，也是全世界数学界和每一个国家争夺的成果。中国蒋春暄于1991年10月25日证明了费马大定理。1992年2月中科院数学所发布新闻，中国人不能证明哥德巴赫猜想包括费马大定理。不允许发表费马大定理论文，只好在《潜科学》上发表。同时寄王元、杨乐、乐茂华……1992年1月15日寄美国普林斯顿大学数学系等600份预印本。国内收到乐茂华来信，国外收到费马大定理专家Paulo Ribenboim来信。1993年6月23日怀尔斯在英国宣布他证明了费马大定理。立刻震动了全世界。但数月后，此证明发现有漏洞。由怀尔斯学生Taylor填补这个漏洞。1994年9月才算完成证明。《科技日报》记者汤东宁了解蒋春暄情况，他想报道蒋春暄费马大定理证明。他走访中科院数学所不允许报道。这又失去一个好机会。蒋春暄把论文寄给桑蒂利教授，他修改重新打印于1994年12月发表在他主编《代数群和几何》上。怀尔斯论文和他与Taylor论文同时于1995年发表由他主编《数学年刊》上。蒋春暄论文在美国发表也比怀尔斯和Taylor早一年，但由于中国政府没有表态，所以在国际上只承认怀尔斯和Taylor证明，不承认蒋春暄证明。桑蒂利教授鼓励蒋春暄写这方面论文。下面是桑蒂利1994年3月18日给蒋春暄来信。
Dear Dr. Jiang, Chun-xuan,
I was happy to receive news from you. You will be pleased to know that I have accepted your article for publication in Algebras Groups and Geometries. The sole change has been the removal of the last line of the test and of references [3.4.5]. This is due to the fact that these references are not published and would damage your papter. Instead of this mention in the current paper, I encourage you to write a condensed article on Fermat theorem for AGG.
You may be interested to know that I have invited Prof. Quing-ming Cheng of the Institute of Mathematics of Fudan University, Shangai, to become an Editor for AGG.
I am working at Vol. III of Elements of Hadronic Mechanics (see enclosed flier) in which I shall review your results published in the Hadronic Journal regarding the total number of electrons predicted by the number theory in the hadronic structure. I shall send you a complimentary copy of the volume with the review of your work when printed.
Wishing you the best, I remain
Yours, Truly
Prof. Ruggero Maria Santilli
1997年8月桑蒂利教授被邀访问中科院数学所，蒋春暄送给他几篇有关iso数论文章。在他从北大出来，他要求我们再一次会面。第二天我去送他，他要求蒋春暄写三篇论文，并写好前言。这三篇论文发表在1998年《代数群和几何》上，共109页。建立完整iso数论，证明了费马大定理和哥德巴赫猜想。否定黎曼假设。奠定蒋春暄的数学基础，受到《数学评论》和《德国数学文摘》高度关注。1999年5月蒋春暄把三篇论文找到《科技日报》汤东宁。他说这次我不去中科院数学所。能够在美国发表为什么我们不能报道？接着全国许多报纸也报道。这是中国第一次民间数学家报道没有通过中国绝对权威单位中科院数学所，这引起中科院数学院士恐慌。他们对蒋春暄成果保持缄默。丘成桐、王元、杨乐、李大潜、谷超豪等院士在暗地里到处活动，一定要把关于蒋春暄在媒体宣传压下去，同时得到《天地生人学术讲座》宋正海等支持和关心，最后发展成为2006年宋正海和何祚庥关于“伪科学”之争。2006年12月28日，胡一虎在凤凰卫视台伪科学之争指出，这一集中必须要让蒋春暄讲清楚。他在被打假的这一方，是很关键的一个人，蒋春暄在凤凰卫视台向全世界宣布他所有的划时代的成果。公然没有一位数学家提出质疑，因为他的成果都是正确的，超世界的，全世界几百年来无人解决的重大成果。桑蒂利指出新数理论500年才出现一次，他理解蒋的工作重要性，所以他全力支持蒋的工作。下面是桑蒂利1998年4月24日来信。
Dear Prof. Chun-Xuan Jiang,
Our Editorial Office has communicated earlier the approval of your paper on the Fermat Theorem for publication in Algebras, Groups and Geometries AS PROMISED in Vol. 15 of 1998, and has communicated today the approval of your papers I and II on the isonumber theory for publication also in AGG and also in 1998.
Pleasae have Prof. Kexi Liu do AS SOON AS POSSIBLE the minor editorial modifications-corrections suggested by our reviewers and send us ONE FINAL ORIGINAL PRINTED IN ONE SIDE WITH EQUAL AND RIGHT MARGINS.
We have also suggested that you combine the two papers into one long paper as soon as possible and publish it in the Proceedings of the Beijing Workshop.
Finally, I invite you to publish all your results in a monograph to be published by Hadronic Press in the series “Advanced Monographs in Mathematics”.
Our Institute shall pay ALL costs, inclduing air mail. In addition, I obtained for you $ 100 by the Publisher for your monograph which he will pay on arrical of the final manuscript here (I can obtain advances for you if you so request, say, I can ask $ 50 advance for you – please let me know).
I have also included your name in a proposal for research support I have recently submitted. I shall do my best to secure research funds for you, although please understand that I cannot assure that.
One application of the isonumber theory which is useful for your monograph and can provide financial research support, is the application of the isonumber theory to the “isocryptograms” as discussed in App. 2. C of my book ELEMENTS OF HADRONIC MECHANICS, Vol. I, which I left in Beijing with Prof. Ren.
Please inspect that appendix and let me know your opinion. If we can indeed construct a new generation of cryptograms, I belive we can sell them here in the USA and obtain a lot of $$$.
In the latter case I can send to you several books on recent studies of crytography which you can then extend to isocryptograms. You are the leaders in isonmbers and the best to do that.
I would like to apologize most sincerely for the hortrendous delay in completing the review of your paper. However, you should know that I had completed my review and approved them in early 1998. The additional months of delay are due to the fact that the papers had also to be reviewed by other mathematicians, according to the policy of our Journal.
I would like to take also the opportunity to express my utmost praise and apprectiation for your work, which I consider of potentially historical importance. Numbers are at the foundation of all of science, and new numbers theories are developed once every half a millennium. This is sufficient to illustrate the importance of your work.
I believe that the publication of your work in AGG, in the Proceedings and then in the invited monograph will help propagate your work throughout the world wide scientific community.
I shall remain at your disposal to help you to my best for the monograph.
My wife Carla joins me in remembering you most warmly and wishing you the best.
Ruggero Maria Santilli
2000年蒋春暄把“专著”手稿送给桑蒂利教授。“专著”名为
Chun-Xuan, Jiang, Foundations of Santiili’s isonumber theory with applications to new cryptograms, Fermat’s theorem and Goldbach’s conjecture, Inter. Acad. Press, 2002, MR 2004c: 11001, http:/www.i-b-r.org/docs/jiang/pdf
经过两年评审，2002年1月23日收到桑蒂利教授信。他们工作几个礼拜每天工作10—12小时，完成你的“专著”编辑工作，并且上网请校对，我相信你们“专著”将改变数论历史。这本书在《数学评论》数论栏排第一位，国内外几十个网转载。下面是桑蒂利教授来信。
Dear Prof. Jiang Chun-xuan,
I am pleased to inform you that, after working for weeks at 10-12 hoursa day, we have completed the editorial control of your monograph.
The final version has been sent to Prof. Aringazin, Director of our Editorial Office for the former USSR, who will compose the monograph in pdf format and upload it in the following papge of the IBR web site
http://www.i-b-r.org/ir00022.htm
which you can also access by first visiting our main page
http://www.i-b-r.org
and then clicking on “Scientific Works at the top. In this way, anybody in China or in the rest of the world can print your monograph and study it. （说明：在这种情况下，在中国或全世界任何地方都可打印或印刷你的“专著”，并且学习你的“专著”，没有版权问题。中国任何出版社都可以重印这本划时代的“专著”）。In addition, the monograph is in regular printing into a book which will be air mailed to you as soon as available.
In the meantime, please print the monograph and make sure that all corrections meet with your approval. In the event you wish any change, please send an e-message to Prof. Aringazin with copy to me so that we do not waste time in communications.
Please verify in particular the Definition of isonumbers of the first kind in Chapter I and that of the second kind in Chapter II. In the version we have received these two definitions are different. I have left the original definition for isonmubers of the first kind and changed that of the second kind along our lines, namely, and the isounit is an element of the original field. Please verify all this.
I have also added a Foreword which I enclose herewith in copy.
As stated in this Foreword, I believe that your monograph will change the history of number theory.
With my utmost appreciation and gratitude, I remain
Yours, Truly
Ruggero Maria Santilli
桑蒂利教授2002年2月2日来信，中国科学家可以印刷和研究你的书，到今天蒋春暄“专著”在美国已脱销，但在中国还没有印刷，蒋春暄愿意提供部分出版费，希望中国出版社重印蒋春暄划时代的书。国内外发行，有电子版，印刷很方便。
Dear Prof. Jiang,
Thanks for the message. As soon as the text is complete in pdf file it will be printed and we shall send you a few copies. In the meantime, your book is available in the web for All Chinese and other scientists to print and study.（说明：没有版权问题，所有中国人和科学家都可打印或印刷并且研究蒋春暄“专著”，请中国所有出版社重印这本划时代的“专著”）。
Please organize a communication to colleagues in China on the availability of your book in the web by giving them also the URL for its access.
Sincerely
Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli
桑蒂利教授为蒋春暄“专著”写一个前言。他指出蒋春暄“专著”是不朽的著作，它开创数论一个新时代。桑蒂利教授是他帮助蒋春暄出版他所有数学工作在全世界传播。如没有桑蒂利教授支持就没有蒋春暄一切。
FOREWORD
In my works (see the bibliography at the end of the Preface) I often expressed the view that the protracted lack of resolution of fundamental problems in science signals the needs of basically new mathematics. This is the case, for example, for: quantitative representations of biological structures; resolution of the vexing problem of grand-unification; invariant treatment of irreversibility at the classical and operator levels; identification of hadronic constituents definable in our spacetime; achievemwnt of a classical representation of antimatter; and other basic open problems.
I have then shown that each of the above open problems admits basically novel resolutions if a new mathematics specifically conceived for the task at hand is built. I have moreover shown that no new mathematics is actually possible without new numbers. For this reason, as a physicist, I have dedicated my primary attention throughout all of my research life to the search of new numbers, because from new numbers new madthematical and physical theories can be constructed via mere compatibility arguments.
In view of the above, I would like to express my utmost appreciation to Professor Chun-xuan Jiang for having understood the significance of the new iso-, geno, hyper-numbers and their isoduals I identified for a resolution of the above problems. The significance of the new numbers had escaped other scholars in number theory in the past two decades since their orginal formulation.
I would like also to congratulate Prof. Jiang for the simly monumental work he has done in this monograph, work that, to my best knowledge, has prior occurrence in the history of number theory in regard to joint novelty, dimension, diversification, articulation and implications.
I have no doubt the Professor Jiang’s monograph creates a new era in number theory which encompasses and includes as particular case all preceding work in the field.
Ruggero Maria Santilli
2002年8月国际数学家大会在北京召开，蒋春暄要求在大会上介绍他划时代的工作，遭到拒绝。他决定不参加，这是中国最大的耻辱。桑蒂利带着蒋春暄划时代的书参加国际数学家大会香港分会，在大会上介绍蒋的著作是最后世纪最重要和最大的发展。下面是桑蒂利2002年8月16日日。
Dear Professor Jiang Chun-xuan,
You will be pleased to know that I am leaving right now for Hong Kong to deliver and important talk in a plenary session at the World Congress in Mathematics which will be held at the University of Hong Kong from August 14 to 18.
I will arrive in Hong Kong on Tuesday at about 5 pm and will stay at the Regal Riverside Hotel, Shatin, Hong Kong, tel. 852-2534 0659, fax+852-2628 2581. I will remain in Hong Kong until August 17 or 18. The conference will be held at the RUN RUN SHAW AUDITORIUM at the Univ. of Hong Kong. I will be there only in the morning sessions.
I shall bring with me printed and bounded copies of your excellent monographs which I have just received from the Publisher. During my talk, I am planing to show your monograph to the audience and present your work as the most important and biggest development in number theory in the last century.
I hope that you, or some of your associates can come to this important meeting. If that is possible, please call the organizer of the this World Congress Professor K. P. SHUM at his mobile phone +852-9029 9924, by mentioning my name and identifying yourself as the author of the monograph on Isonumber Theory. You can also contact the Dean of Sciences of the Univ. of Hong Kong, Tel. 852-2609 6110.
Hoping to see you soon, I remain
Yours, Truly
Ruggero Maria Santilli
下面是桑蒂利2002年8月26日来信
Dear Prof. Jiang Chun-xuan,
Thanks for the message. Yes, I did present your monograph at the World Congress of Mathematicians in Hong Kong as “a true revolution which renders obsolete the conventional number theory”. A copy of the monograph with hard cover has been air mailed to the address in the monograph. Your article has appeared in AGG and a copy will be air mailed to you separately by the Publisher. In case of delay, please let me know.
Ruggero Maria Santilli
挪威数学大师阿贝尔1825年在柏林会见德国数学爱好者建筑工程师克列尔，是他创办《Crell杂志》又称为《纯粹数学与应用数学杂志》发表阿贝尔所有论文。成为数学史流芳百世佳话。当代阿贝尔就是蒋春暄。当代克列尔就是桑蒂利教授，这将也成为数学史流芳百世佳话。
中科院张利华和李宏调查桑蒂利不是数学家。《代数群和几何》不是有名数学杂志，为何祚庥、方舟子、司马南和田松把蒋春暄研究定为中国最大伪科学的基础。桑蒂利是伟大白求恩式国际战士，也只有国民党和日本帝国主义也会说白求恩医术不高。
中国不承认蒋春暄证明费马大定理证明，当然美国和普林斯顿就可以抢夺费马大定理证明首证权。普林斯顿是国际纯数学领导中心，他们可以动员全世界数学界也不承认蒋春暄的工作。同时他们配合中科院也在全世界宣传陈景润（1+2）。这样国内外都不发表蒋春暄的论文并保持缄默，也只有桑蒂利教授在《代数群和几何》杂志上发表蒋春暄的论文。中国数学博客网www.chinabokee.cn/bbs/在数学家栏把蒋春暄排在第一位。引起院士高度恐慌。他们马上把这网封杀。他们已动员连研究生都不要支持蒋春暄工作。
2005年邵逸夫数学奖授给普林斯顿大学怀尔斯，中国民间科学支持者呼吁取消把这个中国式大奖授给怀尔斯。因为蒋春暄比怀尔斯和Taylor早三年证明费马大定理，但不起作用。2005年8月北大用最高礼节接待怀尔斯。《中国青年报》、《科学时报》作了长篇报道。2005年11月2日上海《新闻晨报》把蒋春暄证明世纪数学难题费马大定理却遭“封杀”的事件列为中国“科学打假三大冤案”之一。2006年12月28日蒋春暄在凤凰卫视介绍他的研究工作，这是蒋春暄没有想到的。这些事可能有些来头，中国还是需要蒋的工作，不知这个冤案何时能平反。蒋春暄希望在国内外数学界有一位数学家像邹承鲁对张颖清全息生物学提出质疑一样，对蒋春暄数学研究提出质疑，可惜没有一位数学家会勇敢站出来。
《科学时报》是中国打假报纸，他们大力宣传邹承鲁和何祚庥，是在中国宣传怀尔斯和Taylor费马大定理证明的报纸。现在中国很多数学家不宣传怀尔斯和Taylor。中科院11位院士新自出马宣传怀尔斯和Taylor证明费马大定理，《科学时报》2006年6月2日；6月5日；11月16日，连复旦大学物理学家杨福家也在中国大力宣传怀尔斯。2003年3月6日在人民大会堂李大潜向江泽民总书记宣传怀尔斯和Taylor费马大定理证明，说明中国院士在中国宣传怀尔斯和Taylor花了多少心血和精力。他们以此为荣。
现在有两个问题：（1）蒋春暄和怀尔斯与Taylor谁是第一次证明费马大定理。蒋春暄1991年而怀尔斯和Taylor1994年。在中国发表蒋春暄比怀尔斯和Taylor早三年。在美国发表比怀尔斯和Taylor早一年。（2）蒋春暄证明和怀尔斯与Taylor证明谁最正确。怀尔斯和Taylor是间接证明，非常复杂一般数学家都很难理解。蒋春暄是直接证明，不需要任何数论知识，一般数学家都能理解，这才是费马大定理真正证明。
欣慰的是中国2006年11月出书介绍蒋春暄费马大定理证明，参看刘培杰主编《从毕达哥拉斯到怀尔斯》第365页。只要中国组织数学家对蒋春暄证明进行评定，中国政府向全世界宣布费马大定理证明是中国蒋春暄1991年完成的。这将在国际上引起翻天覆地变化，这将大大提高中国数学在国际上的地位。但这非常困难，因为在中国宣传怀尔斯和Taylor费马大定理证明已溶入中国院士的血液中，这些院士不会改变他们的观点。中国没有一个数学院士出来支持蒋的工作，这是一个悲剧。
全世界不承认蒋的工作。蒋于1995年证明哥德巴赫猜想。1998年否定黎曼假设。从《数学评论》而知，全世界已没有数学家研究这两个问题了。中国哥迷不要证明哥猜想，它是一个非常复杂素数问题，全世界没有一个数学家真正了解哥猜想，即他们几乎都不了解素数理论，如他们不学习Jiang函数J_n(w)，他们不算数论专家。
民科一词是中国科学非常落后一种表现。在国外没有民科概念。只要你有水平任何杂志都可以发表你的文章。他们并不研究你的身份，只研究你的论文。但中国不行。贝尔著《数学大师》一书中指出。本书从芝诺到庞加莱，只提到30多位数学大师，“说起来似乎很奇怪，并非所有伟大的数学家都是学院或大学的数学教授，相当一部分数学家是职业军人、其他人是从神学、法律和医学进入数学界的。”伟大数家是天生的，不是后天培养出来的。中国应该办一个创新杂志，专门发表没有参考文献的论文。1905年爱因斯坦论文就没有参考文献。
中科院院士集团和普林斯顿联合起来，封杀蒋的成果。不承认蒋的成果，保持缄默，只有桑蒂利教授坚决支持蒋。蒋春暄只好在中国网上介绍他的工作，让全13亿中国人知道这一场悲剧。
感谢原科技部部长朱丽兰院士和科技部副部长程津培院士支持和关心，程津培院士说：“社会各界对你的评论并不是一面倒的形势，这其实是可喜的。”支持蒋春暄工作的人越来越多了，支持和宣传怀尔斯和Taylor的人越来越少了。但中科院、北大、复旦和《科学时报》宣传怀尔斯和Taylor工作还要继续下去。